Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Evening in the garden

Friday, January 11, 2008

getting pregnant

I had a quick look at a couple of lists I made near the start of the mating season, and from this I drew a relatively important conclusion:

A significant determiner of pregnancy during a twelve week mating is whether or not the cow is cycling at the start of mating.

That seems obvious, right?

Well, you would have thought so, but I was still surprised at the numbers considering that I had 100% of the cows mated within six weeks - some of the later calvers assisted with fertility treatments (the Ovsynch program, no CIDRs).
Of about eighty cows cycling before the start of mating, four had cycled within the last three weeks (after week ten of mating).
Of the remaining seventy-five, about sixteen cows had cycled recently.
(Those numbers are off the top of my head - I'd have to check the lists again to quote them accurately)

That is more than ever convincing that priority must be given to having healthy cows cycling before mating starts.
And that means getting all the factors that contribute to healthy cycling cows right: An early, fast calving pattern. Feed well. Minimise dystocia.

Last I checked, my bull had a NRR rate of between 40 and 50% - much better than 22% but still not flash. I've finished another 3 week cycle of AB and decided to just hope that my records were as good as last years since the planned PD fell through (I didn't know I had to collect the platform to bridge the milking pit before the vet arrived) and a further delay would have meant dating pregnancies to ascertain whether they were in calf to AB rather than the bull, rather than being able to give a simple in-calf, not detectably in-calf diagnosis for each cow.
Following last year's experience with vet-dated pregnancies, I'm very disinclined to rely on a vet's assessment of how far pregnant a cow is (in previous years I've double-checked them against mating dates, since I was working in herds that did whole-herd scanning and checked dates for all late calvers, and found the vet to be reasonably accurate. Last year's information was worse than useless).
The bull's got another three weeks, and I'll fall back on the 'they all cycle in the end' philosophy to determine which cows are in-calf, possibly PD-ing any uncertain ones in late March. As long as there aren't gross errors in the records, it should still be possible to effectively select late and empty cows for culling and avoid keeping more than one or two very late or empty cows - not enough to greatly impact stocking rate.

January silage



In the past, I've been very dubious about farmers deciding to cut silage in the New Year. Usually I hear of the decision from neighbours who insist they have plenty of grass, when I know for certain that my own farm is heading into careful rationing after difficult weather has impacted grass growth, and ahead of expected drought.

Growth this year has been very on/off. We've had alternate months rain/dry resulting in bursts of growth followed by a slow-down. The cows have been fully fed through-out, but the amount of supplement cut has suffered as the reasonably large second cut I'd hoped to get vanished with the drought, leaving only enough surplus to grab the two paddocks of hay I'd dropped out of the grazing rotation before the grass all but stopped growing - I was measuring growth of about 30 kgDM/ha a day for around a fortnight, less than half what I'd expected.

At the beginning of December the feed ahead was looking tight enough that I decided to draft the lower yielders into a once a day milking herd and cut back their feed, to allow the remainder of the herd to continue being fully fed. The day I separated the cows was the day it began raining, and within ten days there was no further need to ration grass as the urea that had been applied just before the rain gave a further boost to growth rates.
However, the once a day herd looked happy in their small group and I haven't returned them to the main herd, being quite content to milk 'only' ten rows at night.

At the beginning of January both herds were going into grass at 3750kgDM/ha (15 cm in length) and struggling to clean up (down to 2100 kg DM/ha - still on the late spring scale, about five cm). As the grass cover ahead of them had increased their allotted area had been reduced - from 19 days before the dry spell, and 2 - 2.4 ha daily to a 30 day round at 1.4 ha daily. For a few days I'd been considering the possibility of a surplus appearing ahead of the cows, and trying to double-guess the weather to figure out whether it was safe to cut January silage.

Lengthening the round going into the summer is wise - the main reason being that grass growth rates are over their peak in late spring and will decline through summer and autumn. Moving from a short round (which maximises milk production and maintains grass quality in mid-late spring) to a longer one allows the normally good growth rates of December to increase the feed cover across the whole farm without any quality loss, and compensates for the reduced growth expected through January and early February. Maintaining the longer round provides a buffer that balances out the spurts/slow-downs in grass growth through the summer.

To put it in simple terms - if it's dry in summer the grass growth may all but cease. A couple of days of decent rain will restart growth across the whole farm, regardless of what length the individual paddocks are.
In mid-late spring on a 16 - 21 day round, a decent rainfall guarantees a feed supply for the herd for a fortnight, if it doesn't rain again.
On a 28-day round, a decent rainfall guarantees the feed supply for three weeks.
On a 35-day round, a decent rainfall will probably ensure four weeks build up of grass. In practice, rain usually falls every fortnight or three weeks through the summer. To really start suffering from drought, therefore, on a longer round you need to see little or no rain for about six weeks. On a twenty-one day round, three weeks without rain can ensure a feed deficit that it will be hard to recover from. long enough.

This is why I'm wary of taking grass out of the system in the summer. Soil temperatures at this time of year are such that a moisture deficit is almost inevitable - unless rainfall is exceptional, the evaporation rate will be greater than water added through rain. Surplus grass is better employed in building up feed ahead of the cows, to ensure they are fully fed for as long as possible into the summer.
Unless, of course, the farm really does have so much grass that the desired grazing rotation can be achieved while fully feeding the cows, and still there is more food ahead than the cattel can utilise.

Which is where we were at the beginning of January. That's what my gut told me - that I could afford to drop out maybe two paddocks ahead of the cows and cut it for silage in another two or three weeks.
Those pieces of card in the image above?
That was me not only verifying that 'gut feeling', but also establishing exactly how much I could afford to drop out and what growth rates I needed daily to fully feed the cows on the remaining area.
We were already on a thirty day grazing rotation, and I would call that optimal - 28 to 30 days from January to Autumn. The grass is past running to seed at this time of year and quality is easily maintained, provided grazing pressure is hard enough. In general I prefer shorter rounds rather than longer - I'm happy with 45 reducing through early spring, 17 through mid-late, 24 - 30 through summer and 60 in winter - much longer than those and palatability is reduced, growth isn't maximised and the cows may find it harder to leave an even residual. Lots of good farmers say otherwise, and I made the decision to use a very long winter round myself, last winter (because optimising feed quality wasn't my first priority - adequately feeding a large number of cows was).
I could have tightened the cows up further, extending the rotation out to 35 or 40 days then allowing it to come back to a slightly shorter round when growth reduced. I didn't want to do that.
I could have continued allowing the cows the same area, and used the topper to clean up what they left behind. This would maximise milk production per cow right now, but be inefficient use of the grass available, and reduce potential production per hectare.
Or skip the grass ahead of them and plan to cut it when it had bulked into a sufficient crop. The good part about this is that if the weather screws up and the grass stops growing, I can breakfeed those paddocks ot the cows while growth is catching up ahead of them again. The bad part is that if I cut them while growth is in a slow phase, and then run out of grass, I've wasted time and money because in a worst-case scenario I have to feed silage back to the cows in place of the grass removed from the feed wedge.

I needed concrete information to enable the decision.
* Pasture cover immediately ahead of the paddocks I'm contemplating skipping
* pasture cover of the proposed silage paddocks (to check that they're worth cutting)
* Average farm grass cover
* Forecast growth rates (guessed from current growth rates and weather forecast)
* Area required each day for grazing (calculated from cow requirements in kg DM, available cover per ha and number of cows)
* Total farm area
* Total cow numbers

A few calculations told me that I could feed the cows at their present rate, on a thirty day round, with 29 of the 31 available paddocks and a projected growth rate of at least 52 kg DM per hectare per day.
The unknown variable was the weather. If rain didn't fall within a week or so, the farm wouldn't achieve the required 52 kg daily growth, and the skipped paddocks wouldn't bulk up to a decent crop.
The weather forecast said no rain in sight.
I dropped the paddocks out anyway - after all, they could always be grazed if it turned out to have been a bad decision.
A week later we had two days of good rain.

Our neighbour cut silage yesterday. Mine will be ready in a bit over a week. It's a welcome boost to what was a rather low supply of conserved feed set aside for autumn.

in clover

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.